←back to thread

111 points rabinovich | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.209s | source
Show context
nalak ◴[] No.45813277[source]
AI why? Where’s the proof that AI was involved in this?
replies(2): >>45813329 #>>45813944 #
rabinovich ◴[] No.45813329[source]
"A popular tech YouTuber with over 350,000 subscribers has lost his channel after YouTube’s automated systems flagged him for an alleged connection to a completely unrelated Japanese channel that received copyright strikes."
replies(2): >>45813412 #>>45813426 #
echelon ◴[] No.45813426[source]
That's not necessarily AI.

That could be as simple as a database lookup against flagged accounts or a simple heuristic score.

We're over-AI-ing everything.

replies(4): >>45813465 #>>45813466 #>>45813532 #>>45813818 #
1. epolanski ◴[] No.45813465[source]
This reminds me how all of my friends in the last years have replaced special effects/CGI term in movies/ads/shows with AI.

I'm always confused because they've seen special effects for decades, and now the very same explosions, filters, etc, cgi is suddenly AI.