←back to thread

111 points rabinovich | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0.674s | source
Show context
nalak ◴[] No.45813277[source]
AI why? Where’s the proof that AI was involved in this?
replies(2): >>45813329 #>>45813944 #
rabinovich ◴[] No.45813329[source]
"A popular tech YouTuber with over 350,000 subscribers has lost his channel after YouTube’s automated systems flagged him for an alleged connection to a completely unrelated Japanese channel that received copyright strikes."
replies(2): >>45813412 #>>45813426 #
1. nalak ◴[] No.45813412[source]
Automated systems existed much much before LLMs were widely deployed.
replies(4): >>45813434 #>>45813470 #>>45813773 #>>45814118 #
2. prasadjoglekar ◴[] No.45813434[source]
Everything is AI now. Magic fairy dust.
3. philipwhiuk ◴[] No.45813470[source]
An algorithm that does a database lookup is more intelligent than an LLM.
4. layer8 ◴[] No.45813773[source]
AI doesn’t imply LLM.
5. stronglikedan ◴[] No.45814118[source]
The term "the algorithm" has been replaced by "the AI" in modern parlance, and doesn't refer to any specific AI architecture - just something that makes a decision without a human in the loop.