←back to thread

39 points GaryBluto | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.251s | source
Show context
eqvinox ◴[] No.45807023[source]
Ok, so it can cause some brain damage. That's not good.

But does it cause more damage than smoking? Alcohol? Cannabis in young people?

We give people the right to exercise their own judgement in getting hurt for pleasure on those, so if the argument is that this one is not OK it better be an order of magnitude worse than the recreational drugs.

(I guess there's a distinction between the act and a recording of it, but last I checked smoking and alcohol are still legal in media for adults.)

Ed.: the act is apparently illegal too, "Due to these dangers, non-fatal strangulation and non-fatal suffocation were made a criminal offence as part of the Domestic Abuse Act 2021".

And it's really... odd... how the entire article is written as if the practice is solely performed by men on women. (Even though that might be the prevailing pattern, this kind of 'condensing down' is ultimately sexist erasure.)

replies(5): >>45807136 #>>45807283 #>>45808078 #>>45808916 #>>45809021 #
GaryBluto ◴[] No.45807136[source]
We even count domestic violence against men under the umbrella of "violence against women and girls" - men don't matter here.

It's unsurprising. GB has an unholy trinity of excuses for authoritarian laws:

1. "Think of the women and girls!"

2. "Think of the children!"

3. "This is a sacrifice we have to make to stop terrorism!" (which has taken a backseat to the first two)

replies(2): >>45808012 #>>45808046 #
1. mock-possum ◴[] No.45808046[source]
> We even count domestic violence against men under the umbrella of "violence against women and girls"

How is that possible, they’re categorically opposite?