←back to thread

36 points fortran77 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.206s | source
1. Frieren ◴[] No.45797265[source]
> Labor is a major cost, and cutting it is one way to bolster profit margins.

This also shows that big corporations do not expect growth. Investing for growth is the best strategy unless the company is sure that there is no more growth. Then cutting expenses makes sense, short term at least.

> In an environment where employment growth is already low, any increase in layoffs could lead the economy to start shedding jobs.

Stagflation is a very likely outcome of current policy. Job loss, increase in prices, shrinking economy, etc.

> While there is evidence that AI is cutting into demand for certain jobs, such as software development

* citation needed.

> “Labor hoarding was especially pronounced in higher-wage jobs, where employees are harder to find and therefore more costly to lose,”

This is one problem with having increasing monopolies in the sector. When most developers will be hired by the same dozen companies there is no job market, but just a cartel in line with the 2010 no-poaching agreements.

- These agreements, which can take various forms, aim to reduce competition in labour markets. They also carry the risk of suppressing wages and limiting job opportunities for employees. While such agreements may be pursuant to ancillary legitimate restrictions, they are often viewed as horizontal cartel agreements necessitating a per se approach (https://www.legal500.com/developments/thought-leadership/no-...)

So, nothing new. Big tech screwing software developers like they always do.