←back to thread

346 points swatson741 | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
1. stared ◴[] No.45789051[source]
The original title is "Yes you should understand backprop" - which is good and descriptive.
replies(1): >>45790904 #
2. dpflan ◴[] No.45790904[source]
Agree, better title for this post; the fact that back prop is a leaky abstraction is a reason one should understand it and know how to do the mechanics by hand to truly experience it and develop understanding and intuition. Software / code abstracting away even more of the process leaves it open to magical thinking. I had to do hand calculations and convolutions in my Deep Learning graduate school course.
replies(1): >>45791013 #
3. xpe ◴[] No.45791013[source]
Yep. Also, I don’t find the metaphorical connection to leaky abstractions useful at all. It feels strained.