←back to thread

574 points nh43215rgb | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
hexbin010 ◴[] No.45781498[source]
> “ICE officials have told us that an apparent biometric match by Mobile Fortify is a ‘definitive’ determination of a person’s status and that an ICE officer may ignore evidence of American citizenship—including a birth certificate—if the app says the person is an alien,”

This is "computer says no (not a citizen)". Which is horrifying

They've just created an app to justify what they were already doing right? And the argument will be "well it's a super complex app run by a very clever company so it can't be wrong"?

replies(13): >>45781606 #>>45781662 #>>45781821 #>>45782252 #>>45782541 #>>45782817 #>>45782848 #>>45782971 #>>45783123 #>>45783772 #>>45784468 #>>45784720 #>>45786967 #
rgsahTR ◴[] No.45781662[source]
> They've just created an app to justify what they were already doing right?

This was also one of the more advanced theories about the people selection and targeting AI apps used in Gaza. I've only heard one journalist spell it out, because many journalists believe that AI works.

But the dissenter said that they know it does not work and just use it to blame the AI for mistakes.

replies(5): >>45782107 #>>45782130 #>>45782878 #>>45783028 #>>45783384 #
bko ◴[] No.45782878[source]
It's better that the alternative which is humans. Unless you think enforcing laws or ever having the need to establish identity should never take place
replies(11): >>45782905 #>>45782914 #>>45782959 #>>45782980 #>>45783029 #>>45783156 #>>45783385 #>>45784431 #>>45787217 #>>45788483 #>>45792841 #
sennalen ◴[] No.45782980[source]
It's humans. This is like TSA's fake bomb detectors with nothing inside the plastic shell
replies(1): >>45783387 #
bko ◴[] No.45783387[source]
You think the person at the TSA that gets paid 40k a year is better at facial recognition than a computer?
replies(7): >>45783450 #>>45783557 #>>45783603 #>>45783644 #>>45783650 #>>45783831 #>>45791172 #
snovv_crash ◴[] No.45783557[source]
Having worked in this space (ID verification of live-humans to ID documents), yes, I absolutely think people are better at the 1:1 person:document yes/no question than I think an AI model is at saying which of 200M people this face is. Just having a prior of a physical document with their name and likeness on it already makes up 1 factor of the N-factor authentication.
replies(1): >>45786553 #
bko ◴[] No.45786553[source]
If you really worked in this space you would know that AI models don't scan 200M people because... why would they? Seems kind of weird.
replies(2): >>45786676 #>>45788494 #
1. queenkjuul ◴[] No.45788494[source]
So the model is verifying faces against ... A database of zero faces? Surely there's 200M faces in there, or else how does it work?
replies(1): >>45788661 #
2. ThrowMeAway1618 ◴[] No.45788661[source]
>So the model is verifying faces against ... A database of zero faces? Surely there's 200M faces in there, or else how does it work?

No. The model is, "Hey! this guy is being a pain in the ass. He even claimed that The President wasn't blessed with superintelligence and doesn't actually smell really good!

We need to get this terrorist off the streets! He sure looks a whole lot like that illegal on the FBI most wanted list, doesn't he? Off to CECOT with him!

What's that? He's a twelfth generation citizen? No way! Look, the app I used to claim this guy matches an illegal who's also a child rapist!

Your papers are all fake (if, as a citizen he's even carrying them). Onto the plane with you Senor.

That's the model. Feel free to disagree, but come back and reread this comment in 18 months. I hope you read it then and think "what a paranoid guy! Nothing like that could ever happen here!" But I'm not holding my breath. :(

replies(1): >>45789127 #
3. actionfromafar ◴[] No.45789127[source]
In 18 months the discussion will have moved on to make excuses for the conentration camps. Alligator Auschwitz and such camps must be much larger to hold everyone.