←back to thread

46 points CharlesW | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
meowface ◴[] No.45784860[source]
Unpopular opinion here but I don't see any benefit in breaking up goliaths like Microsoft, Google, Amazon, OpenAI.

OpenAI (optically) came out of nowhere and took over everything in a few years. A future company also could. We should punish violation of regulations and the law when it occurs. We don't need to be interfering just because we feel a company is too good at being a company.

If OpenAI violated anything with the recent non-profit stuff, sue or charge them.

replies(6): >>45784904 #>>45784991 #>>45785116 #>>45785170 #>>45785296 #>>45785564 #
BrenBarn ◴[] No.45785296[source]
> A future company also could.

Then they should be broken up too.

> We don't need to be interfering just because we feel a company is too good at being a company.

We absolutely do, because "being good at being a company" has become a sort of paperclip-maximizing game that is pretty well divorced from anything beneficial to society.

replies(1): >>45787364 #
1. meowface ◴[] No.45787364[source]
>We absolutely do, because "being good at being a company" has become a sort of paperclip-maximizing game that is pretty well divorced from anything beneficial to society.

I doubt that that's true. In some cases at some companies, but I wouldn't be surprised if harm to society is per capita more likely at non-monopolies than at monopolies.