←back to thread

39 points leglock | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.241s | source
Show context
gray_-_wolf ◴[] No.45772660[source]
Pricing model for a terminal. What a time to be alive.

> Can I continue to use Warp as my primary terminal?

> Yes, the Terminal features of Warp will continue to be free to use for developers across Windows, Mac, and Linux.

Well this is something at least I guess.

replies(10): >>45772771 #>>45772828 #>>45772832 #>>45772860 #>>45772863 #>>45772874 #>>45772915 #>>45773008 #>>45773047 #>>45773107 #
dvt ◴[] No.45772863[source]
> Pricing model for a terminal. What a time to be alive.

As soon as they raised like 50M+ (why you'd ever need 50 million dollars to build a terminal—which have been essentially "solved" since the 1970s—is a pretty good question), this was bound to happen. Same nonsense will happen to Zed, etc.

replies(2): >>45772892 #>>45774855 #
mmh0000 ◴[] No.45774855[source]
To be fair, for those of us who live in a terminal, the terminal is/was not solved.

Old terminals are slow and have a bunch of weird Unicode issues.

Now, Warp is a terrible product, and I have nothing nice to say about them.

But look at modern terminals like Kitty or Ghostty. There are so many very nice improvements. Like mouse support that works well (as opposed to "kind of works, but who needs a mouse?!, won't fix"), fast keyboard response (you'd think it wouldn't be noticeable, but it's very noticeable), copy-and-paste that makes sense and isn't different from everything else on the system, etc.

https://sw.kovidgoyal.net/kitty/

https://ghostty.org/

replies(2): >>45777652 #>>45783085 #
1. wonger_ ◴[] No.45777652[source]
And if you want to overhaul everything obsolete about the terminal and the shell, there's still more room for improvement: https://arcan-fe.com/2022/04/02/the-day-of-a-new-command-lin...