←back to thread

217 points fortran77 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
SurceBeats ◴[] No.45767762[source]
The ICEBlock removal is absurd when you consider Waze has been warning drivers about police locations for... Years? The only difference is which government agency is being monitored. This sets a dangerous precedent for selective enforcement of ToS really
replies(12): >>45767825 #>>45768187 #>>45768254 #>>45768358 #>>45768379 #>>45768456 #>>45768742 #>>45769848 #>>45770354 #>>45770936 #>>45771616 #>>45772295 #
jfim ◴[] No.45770354[source]
> This sets a dangerous precedent for selective enforcement of ToS really

Companies can enforce their terms of service as they see fit, including enforcing them selectively or not at all, with very few limitations. They're not bound by precedent as courts would be, nor do they need to be fair.

replies(2): >>45770683 #>>45770796 #
matthewdgreen ◴[] No.45770796[source]
Leaving aside the obvious governmental influence in this “private company’s decision”, we, as a democratic society, have the right to decide when and if the two major smartphone OS makers have the right to ban apps. We even have the right to decide whether those exclusive app stores should exist. Whatever I thought about this matter before, my feelings are different after this decision.
replies(1): >>45771754 #
vorpalhex ◴[] No.45771754[source]
Do we, a democratic society, have a right to pick your breakfast?

Can we force you into a career?

Can we force you to right a book?

What if you work with a few people? Can we compel you to right a book then?

What if you work with a lot of people, a few thousand? Can we make you write a book in that case?

replies(2): >>45771818 #>>45773050 #
1. sixothree ◴[] No.45773050{4}[source]
> Do we, a democratic society

Can we say that if we only have two app stores and both are controlled by the government?