←back to thread

Can we talk about the rude installers not asking for installation locations?

47 points breezk0 | 2 comments | 31 Oct 25 14:16 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source

Title.

I think it is very rude to just install to any "default" directory and not asks the user where he wants it to be installed.

Show context
StableAlkyne ◴[31 Oct 25 14:49 UTC] No.45772574[source]▶
The most annoying instance of this is installers in Windows that just assume you want to go into `C:/Program Files`, which nowadays requires admin to be modified

This is very annoying on company machines where you may not have admin, since now there's red tape with your IT because the installer was poorly written.

Half the reason I use the WSL is because you at least get "root" on it, so permissions are never an issue

Edit: there may be something lost in translation. This post is in reference to software your IT already approves, which happens to only install to program files.

replies(4): >>45772603 #>>45772720 #>>45772764 #>>45772829 #
1. keyringlight ◴[31 Oct 25 15:00 UTC] No.45772720[source]▶
The other choice that some developers decide upon for 'convenience' is within appdata, so admin isn't as much of an issue if at all.
replies(1): >>45772802 #
2. bell-cot ◴[31 Oct 25 15:05 UTC] No.45772802[source]▶
On Windows, I'd classify the "where all has this thing put my data?" problem as worse than the "just assume C:/Program Files" installers.