←back to thread

How the cochlea computes (2024)

(www.dissonances.blog)
475 points izhak | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
edbaskerville ◴[] No.45762928[source]
To summarize: the ear does not do a Fourier transform, but it does do a time-localized frequency-domain transform akin to wavelets (specifically, intermediate between wavelet and Gabor transforms). It does this because the sounds processed by the ear are often localized in time.

The article also describes a theory that human speech evolved to occupy an unoccupied space in frequency vs. envelope duration space. It makes no explicit connection between that fact and the type of transform the ear does—but one would suspect that the specific characteristics of the human cochlea might be tuned to human speech while still being able to process environmental and animal sounds sufficiently well.

A more complicated hypothesis off the top of my head: the location of human speech in frequency/envelope is a tradeoff between (1) occupying an unfilled niche in sound space; (2) optimal information density taking brain processing speed into account; and (3) evolutionary constraints on physiology of sound production and hearing.

replies(12): >>45763026 #>>45763057 #>>45763066 #>>45763124 #>>45763139 #>>45763700 #>>45763804 #>>45764016 #>>45764339 #>>45764582 #>>45765101 #>>45765398 #
crazygringo ◴[] No.45765398[source]
Yeah, this article feels like it's very much setting up a ridiculous strawman.

Nobody who knows anything about signal processing has ever suggested that the ear performs a Fourier transform across infinite time.

But the ear does perform something very much akin to the FFT (fast Fourier transform), turning discrete samples into intensities at frequencies -- which is, of course, what any reasonable person means when they say the ear does a Fourier transform.

This article suggests it's accomplished by something between wavelet and Gabor. Which, yes, is not exactly a Fourier transform -- but it's producing something that is about 95-99% the same in the end.

And again, nobody would ever suggest the ear was performing the exact math that the FFT does, down to the last decimal point. But these filters still work essentially the same way as the FFT in terms of how they respond to a given frequency, it's really just how they're windowed.

So if anyone just wants a simple explanation, I would say yes the ear does a Fourier transform. A discrete one with windowing.

replies(3): >>45766343 #>>45767588 #>>45768701 #
waffletower ◴[] No.45767588[source]
The article does a fair job of positing that the ear provides temporal/frequency resolution along a logarithmic scale but doesn't assert clearly that this resolution is fixed with the STFT and the Gabor variant. It hints that wavelets are more akin in terms of perceptual scaling as a function of frequency but not articulately. But it is interesting that the author's thesis, how Fourier mathematics isn't appropriate for describing human perception of sound, relates human hearing to the Gabor transform which is thoroughly a derivative of discrete Fourier mathematics.
replies(1): >>45768728 #
1. kragen ◴[] No.45768728[source]
Many solutions to differential equations are thoroughly derived from the Fourier transform too, and so is Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. That doesn't mean they're the same thing.