←back to thread

IRCd service (2024)

(example.fi)
105 points pabs3 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
qudat ◴[] No.45758466[source]
IRC is having its second wind as far as I can tell. Libera is very active and it offers an experience that is unlike the over-stimulating chat apps like discord.

Some projects have both a discord and an IRC channel and when you compare the two chats the conversations are wildly different — IRC being a more focused, on topic chat without floods of gifs, emojis, and off-topic channels.

The hardest part about using IRC is getting chat history and mobile notifications. As part of https://pico.sh we run a soju bouncer (soju.im) for our members to use to help with that. We have a bunch of daily active users.

replies(2): >>45759071 #>>45762072 #
sho_hn ◴[] No.45759071[source]
Discord has some structures and dynamics that really work against it for the sort of communities IRC excels at.

The standard Discord experience has you look for and join a "server", each of which is meant to feel like distinct island. This has every server duplicate the same set of boilerplate #general, #off-topic etc. channels, as if there are no others. As a result the vast majority of servers are fairly dead and barren, the userbase is spread too thin. Also because the UX makes switching between servers a fairly heavy context switch, so monitoring this deluge of channels is not fun and nobody can stay on top of all of their servers.

I once looked around for maker-y/electronics Discords, and joined probably 7-8, and they were all dead. ##electronics on Libera is highly active.

replies(4): >>45759706 #>>45760309 #>>45762044 #>>45762444 #
1. kaoD ◴[] No.45760309[source]
If you think about it IRC is the same, but making an IRC server is much harder so nobody does it, while creating a Discord server is so easy you'll have too many.

IRC is also different in the sense that it is federated, but when most people think about an IRC "server" they actually think about "networks".