←back to thread

29 points hackthemack | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
r721 ◴[] No.45755881[source]
I think he got confused with the terminology - Putin said he tested nuclear-powered Burevestnik, but that's not the same as testing nuclear weapons.
replies(2): >>45756038 #>>45756073 #
measurablefunc ◴[] No.45756038[source]
Technically it is a nuclear weapon. It uses radioactive material in some non-trivial capacity.
replies(1): >>45756080 #
ggm ◴[] No.45756080[source]
I think "technically" is doing a lot of heavy lifting when the nuclear component is an engine. It's like classic geek ratholing.

if a nuclear submarine launches a tomahawk with a non-nuclear warhead is the entire weapons system "a nuclear weapon" in your eyes? Is that a breach of the arms treaties, and breaches "no first strike" posture and invites second strike response with nuclear warheads?

replies(1): >>45756113 #
measurablefunc ◴[] No.45756113[source]
I wasn't arguing about semantics. Trump is an idiot but the people who work for him are not as idiotic so they saw the latest propaganda from Russia & decided that the new policy would be the proper response.
replies(2): >>45756623 #>>45756824 #
1. ggm ◴[] No.45756623[source]
Russia tested a nuclear capable long duration engine and the US response as reported to media is that the WH requested a resumption of nuclear weapons tests. Not nuclear engine tests.
replies(1): >>45756694 #
2. measurablefunc ◴[] No.45756694[source]
The public will be happy w/ their response. You're drawing distinctions very few people care about which is why Trump is president & you're arguing w/ random internet strangers about the absurdity of the response.