←back to thread

61 points xyzzy3000 | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
jeroenhd[dead post] ◴[] No.45692501[source]
[flagged]
1. A1kmm ◴[] No.45692760[source]
I've personally been unable to pass AI 'liveness' detection (which was a high-stress situation when it related to something my new employer asked me to do after I already resigned from my previous role) despite repeated attempts and all I have is alopecia areata affecting my eyelashes / eyebrows (a relatively common condition).

These models are discriminatory for a lot of people, I'd say, and shouldn't be allowed.

replies(1): >>45692870 #
2. jeroenhd ◴[] No.45692870[source]
I think these models are fine for people who they do work on, but it's idiotic to assume facial recognition works for everyone. I should be able to use a website if my webcam is broken.

The practical problems are all caused by AI companies lying through their teeth and making bold claims and their customers being dumb enough to believe them.

The actual problem that needs solving is the fact that you need to validate your age without a form of solid proof being available in the first place. In cases where everyone has digital ID already there are technical solutions to solve that problem, and until those are available for free, it's idiotic to require the use of such technology in the first place. The UK doesn't have common, accessible digital ID yet they expect digital identification of some kind to just happen.