Most active commenters
  • epistasis(5)
  • fukka42(3)

←back to thread

/dev/null is an ACID compliant database

(jyu.dev)
529 points swills | 12 comments | 23 Oct 25 21:28 UTC | HN request time: 0.79s | source | bottom
Show context
rezonant ◴[23 Oct 25 22:34 UTC] No.45688230[source]▶
But is /dev/null web scale?
replies(3): >>45688273 #>>45688300 #>>45688765 #
epistasis ◴[23 Oct 25 22:38 UTC] No.45688273[source]▶
Yes, /dev/null can even power sites like zombo.com
replies(1): >>45688321 #
bottled_poe ◴[23 Oct 25 22:41 UTC] No.45688321[source]▶
What’s the I/O throughput of /dev/null ?
replies(2): >>45688365 #>>45688374 #
epistasis ◴[23 Oct 25 22:45 UTC] No.45688365[source]▶
Single client, I'm getting ~5GB/s, both on an 8-year-old intel server, and on my M1 ARM chip.

However with a single server, it doesn't perfectly linearly scale with multiple clients. I'm getting

1 client: 5GB/s

2 clients: 8GB/s

3 client: 8.7GB/s

replies(2): >>45688467 #>>45688477 #
1. fukka42 ◴[23 Oct 25 22:54 UTC] No.45688467[source]▶
I'm easily reaching 30GB/s with a single client:

    dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null bs=1M status=progress
A second dd process hits the same speed.
replies(2): >>45688575 #>>45688592 #
2. epistasis ◴[23 Oct 25 23:05 UTC] No.45688575[source]▶
My artisanal architecture design uses writes with a few characters and uses unix pipes:

    yes | pv > /dev/null
I hope that in my next rewrite I can advance to larger block sizes.
replies(1): >>45688906 #
3. rezonant ◴[23 Oct 25 23:06 UTC] No.45688592[source]▶
What's the best hardware for running a /dev/null instance for production?
replies(2): >>45688994 #>>45689263 #
4. fukka42 ◴[23 Oct 25 23:40 UTC] No.45688906[source]▶
Interestingly I tried this as well and was disappointed with the results:

  yes $(printf %1024s | tr " " "y") | pv > /dev/null
About the same throughput as letting yes output a single character. I guess Unix pipes are slow.
replies(1): >>45689193 #
5. epistasis ◴[23 Oct 25 23:50 UTC] No.45688994[source]▶
I usually do a kubernetes cluster on top of VMs. But sometimes when I really want to scale the standard cloud server less platforms all support /dev/null out of the box. (Except for Windows...)
replies(1): >>45689660 #
6. 1718627440 ◴[24 Oct 25 00:16 UTC] No.45689193{3}[source]▶
> I guess Unix pipes are slow.

Or string concatenation, or pipeviewer.

replies(2): >>45689287 #>>45690060 #
7. __turbobrew__ ◴[24 Oct 25 00:26 UTC] No.45689263[source]▶
A single resistor at ground voltage.
replies(1): >>45690063 #
8. fukka42 ◴[24 Oct 25 00:30 UTC] No.45689287{4}[source]▶
yes doesn't do string concatenation, at least not in the loop that matters. It just prepares a buffer of bytes once and writes it to stdout repeatedly.

https://github.com/coreutils/coreutils/blob/master/src/yes.c

9. wowczarek ◴[24 Oct 25 01:24 UTC] No.45689660{3}[source]▶
> Except for Windows...

copy c:\file nul

It's been there since DOS or more likely CP/M :)

replies(1): >>45690314 #
10. eru ◴[24 Oct 25 02:23 UTC] No.45690060{4}[source]▶
Compare https://codegolf.stackexchange.com/questions/199528/fastest-...
11. eru ◴[24 Oct 25 02:24 UTC] No.45690063{3}[source]▶
That doesn't support expected features like 'stat /dev/null'.
12. epistasis ◴[24 Oct 25 03:05 UTC] No.45690314{4}[source]▶
Still need an adapter library though! Fortunately there are about 7 competing implementations on npm and most of them only have 5-6 transitive dependencies.