←back to thread

269 points youz | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.206s | source
Show context
CaptainOfCoit ◴[] No.45688303[source]
I find it slightly ironic that that statements ends with "YouTube Shorts" and not just "YouTube". What in particular makes the shorts so much worse compared to regular videos? If life is short, shouldn't one try to avoid spending too much time on YouTube overall?
replies(11): >>45688323 #>>45688346 #>>45688348 #>>45688358 #>>45688379 #>>45688392 #>>45688413 #>>45688420 #>>45688474 #>>45688517 #>>45688610 #
1. codemac ◴[] No.45688420[source]
attention required: 10 minute video > 10 second short

When the written word took over with the printing press, the same concern was levied. The amount of attention required to listen and memorize a story/poem is a lot more than just reading it.

The change with smart phones is just one of access/time spent on these things. There are people who are spending ~5 hours/day watching this content. There is a big difference between someone listening to 5 hours of a single poem, to reading 5 hours of a single book, to reading 5 hours of blog posts, to watching 5 hours of a youtube video, to watching 5 hours of random videos, to 5 hours of <10s videos.