←back to thread

14 points redasadki | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.012s | source
Show context
gjsman-1000 ◴[] No.45684386[source]
HN, and tech libertarians in general, have been trying to square multiple values together:

1. Decentralized

2. Anonymous

3. Trustworthy

4. Immune (from bad actors)

History has shown that these values are incompatible. Not a little incompatible - completely incompatible. We only have three decks of cards open to us:

1. Open and anonymous (and hopelessly corrupted by bad actors to the point of uselessness - phase 1 - Google only got popular in the first place because people couldn't dig through the manure)

2. Closed (held hostage by Big Tech curation - you are here - phase 2 - but corruption causes government intervention)

3. Open and accountable (identities tied to the real world, with real world accountability - incoming phase - but at least you don’t need to worry about DDoS as much)

There is no other option that works, any more than 1 + 1 + 1 = 4, no matter how badly we wish it existed.

replies(3): >>45684635 #>>45684906 #>>45684967 #
kridsdale1 ◴[] No.45684635[source]
> 1 + 1 + 1 = 4

If we’re talking about representing the vector glyph of 4 with 3 popsicle sticks, this equation is true.

replies(1): >>45684717 #
1. redasadki ◴[] No.45684717[source]
What is this, Reddit?
replies(1): >>45686153 #
2. bigyabai ◴[] No.45686153[source]
Yeah, stop trying to rationalize their bad-faith argument!