←back to thread

763 points tartoran | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.414s | source
Show context
mikeyouse ◴[] No.45682307[source]
> Tim Rieser, former senior aide to Senator Leahy who wrote the 2011 amendment mandating information gathering, told the BBC the gateway's removal meant the State Department was "clearly ignoring the law".

We're in a really bad place... with a servile congress, it turns out there aren't really any laws constraining the executive branch. When everything relies on "independent IGs" for law enforcement inside executive branch departments, and the President can fire them all without consequence or oversight, then it turns out there is no law.

replies(21): >>45682323 #>>45682445 #>>45682511 #>>45682590 #>>45682838 #>>45682977 #>>45682980 #>>45683124 #>>45683225 #>>45683230 #>>45683339 #>>45683432 #>>45683533 #>>45683596 #>>45683626 #>>45683638 #>>45683774 #>>45683801 #>>45683853 #>>45683854 #>>45683942 #
Joeri ◴[] No.45682838[source]
When a different side takes control of the justice department they may choose to go after all those who broke the law by order of this president. The president might be protected from consequences according to the supreme court, but those answering to the president are not.

This administration has set the standard that the justice department can be weaponized against political enemies. The ratchet only goes one way in American politics, presidents never relinquish the powers claimed by their predecessors.

replies(6): >>45682885 #>>45682894 #>>45682904 #>>45682967 #>>45683411 #>>45683693 #
dirtyoldmick[dead post] ◴[] No.45682894[source]
[flagged]
elaus ◴[] No.45682946[source]
As someone not from the US and looking from the outside: it seems there is a _significant_ difference between the two administrations in this regard?
replies(2): >>45683210 #>>45683935 #
SanjayMehta ◴[] No.45683210[source]
As another someone from the outside looking in, the difference is in the reporting in the old media.

Biden had the support of the media and his lawfare and misdeeds were glossed over.

One example was the Hunter Biden laptop. Nord Stream pipeline sabotage was another.

Trump's shenanigans are just getting more attention. But to be fair, his shenanigans are dialled up to 11 while Biden was at a more modest 8.

replies(1): >>45683268 #
1. mikeyouse ◴[] No.45683268[source]
We're talking specifically about lawfare - so no idea why you're talking about the Nord Stream pipeline? These banal observations about 'both sides' are so shallow.

Name Biden's lawfare. What exactly did he abuse the Justice Department to do?

replies(2): >>45685683 #>>45690128 #
2. ahmeneeroe-v2 ◴[] No.45685683[source]
They assisted in the NY AG's prosecution.
3. SanjayMehta ◴[] No.45690128[source]
You might be talking about lawfare, I'm pointing out how your media carries water for one side covering up petty vendettas against Trump by the Biden regime, all the way to suppressing blatant acts of terrorism against an ally - sorry vassal state - Germany.

Read something other than NYT.