←back to thread

393 points JnBrymn | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.29s | source
Show context
varispeed ◴[] No.45676118[source]
Text is linear, whereas image is parallel. I mean when people often read they don't scan text from left to right (or different direction, depending on language), but rather read the text all at once or non-linearly. Like first lock on keywords and then read adjacent words to get meaning, often even skipping some filler sentences unconsciously.

Sequential reading of text is very inefficient.

replies(5): >>45676232 #>>45676919 #>>45677443 #>>45677649 #>>45681565 #
jb1991 ◴[] No.45677649[source]
I think you’re making a lot of assumptions about how people read.
replies(1): >>45678093 #
com2kid ◴[] No.45678093[source]
He isn't, plenty of studies have been done on the topic. Eyes dart around a lot when reading.
replies(1): >>45678260 #
jb1991 ◴[] No.45678260[source]
People do skip words or scan for key phrases, but reading still happens in sequence. The brain depends on word order and syntax to make sense of text, so you cannot truly read it all at once. Skimming just means you sample parts of a linear structure, not that reading itself is non-linear. Eye-tracking studies confirm this sequential processing (check out the Rayner study in Psychological Bulletin if you are interested).
replies(2): >>45680336 #>>45685572 #
com2kid ◴[] No.45680336[source]
Thanks for the reference!

Reading is def not 100% linear, as I find myself skipping ahead to see who is talking or what type of sentence I am reading (question, exclamation, statement).

There is an interesting discussion down thread about ADHD and sequential reading. As someone who has ADHD I may be biased by how my brain works. I definitely don't read strictly linearly, there is a lot of jumping around and assembling of text.

replies(2): >>45682103 #>>45684709 #
1. dahart ◴[] No.45682103[source]
> Reading is def not 100% linear, as I find myself skipping ahead to see who is talking or what type of sentence I am reading (question, exclamation, statement).

My initial reaction was to say speak for yourself about what reading is or isn’t, and that text is written linearly, but the more I think about it, the more I think you have a very good point. I think I read mostly linear and don’t often look ahead for punctuation. But sentence punctuation changes both the meaning and presumed tone of words that preceded it, and it’s useful to know that while reading the words. Same goes for something like “, Barry said.” So meaning in written text is definitely not 100% linear, and that justifies reading in non-linear ways. This, I’m sure, is one reason that Spanish has the pre-sentence question mark “¿”. And I think there are some authors who try to put who’s talking in front most of the time, though I can’t name any off the top of my head.