←back to thread

57 points rzk | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.201s | source
Show context
Qem ◴[] No.45671877[source]
My hypothesis is a bit different. Instead of logarithimic time perception, informational time perception. Children have brains with high plasticity and huge new information acquisition (learning) rates. Those rates drop as plasticity decreases when one gets older. Those "bitrates" of new information flowing into long-term memory act as sand flowing through a hourglass. A fixed amount of sand represents a fixed amount of subjective time. When those rates drop, we feel time runs faster, because now the same amount of sand (subjective time, information) stretches over more clocktime.
replies(5): >>45674408 #>>45674811 #>>45674993 #>>45680720 #>>45684503 #
IncreasePosts ◴[] No.45674993[source]
I think everyone intuitively understands this too. If you spend the next 3 months sitting in your boring office job that you've done 1000 days before, those 3 months may disappear entirely from your memory. Compared to taking the next 3 months and traveling to some strange land far away from home, and I bet those 3 months will stick out in your mind until your dying days.
replies(1): >>45675915 #
kridsdale1 ◴[] No.45675915[source]
Controversial take: isn’t this a strong point in favor of having as many romantic partners as possible during one’s life?
replies(2): >>45676096 #>>45679518 #
1. Carlseymanh ◴[] No.45679518[source]
It really does not work like that, you start mixing everything and everyone up in a depressing blob after a while. I can't even remember the names of people i thought I loved or at least cared about. Compared with my last five years in a serious, committed relationship, its a night and day difference. To the next five years, and the ten after that hopefully.