←back to thread

160 points xbmcuser | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.216s | source
Show context
hoistbypetard ◴[] No.45678022[source]
I hope it's on the way, but I don't think the Pioneer Na is yet a sign of this revolution. This detailed review didn't leave me in a hurry to go get one, anyway:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OoZ_g_MShTw

replies(3): >>45678396 #>>45678437 #>>45680342 #
cyberax ◴[] No.45678396[source]
The idea is not that Na-Ion batteries are better than LFPs, they are not. The main goal is to make them dirt cheap.

It seems that $15 per kWh of storage should be achievable with them. At this price, it's trivial to install enough grid-scale storage to completely move off fossil fuels in more southern areas.

replies(5): >>45678535 #>>45678602 #>>45679257 #>>45679956 #>>45680085 #
1. dzhiurgis ◴[] No.45679257[source]
They are better in cold and have higher charge rates. Eventually (10-20years) they’ll be cheaper than LFP. All while 15% lower volumetric density.