←back to thread

447 points AbhishekParmar | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.237s | source
Show context
kantbtrue ◴[] No.45671020[source]
“13,000× faster” sounds huge, but I wonder what it’s being compared to. Quantum speedups are always tricky to measure
replies(1): >>45671059 #
jonathanstrange ◴[] No.45671059[source]
The article states: “...13,000 times faster on Willow than the best classical algorithm on one of the world’s fastest supercomputers...”

I agree it's not very precise without knowing which of the world's fastest supercomputers they're talking about, but there was no need to leave out this tidbit.

replies(2): >>45671153 #>>45674702 #
nicce ◴[] No.45674702[source]
I don’t understand how these papers get accepted
replies(2): >>45675516 #>>45679034 #
1. ◴[] No.45679034[source]