←back to thread

Google flags Immich sites as dangerous

(immich.app)
1005 points janpio | 2 comments | 22 Oct 25 20:53 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
jdsully ◴[23 Oct 25 01:39 UTC] No.45677260[source]▶
The one thing I never understood about these warnings is how they don't run afoul of libel laws. They are directly calling you a scammer and "attacker". The same for Microsoft with their unknown executables.

They used to be more generic saying "We don't know if its safe" but now they are quite assertive at stating you are indeed an attacker.

replies(4): >>45677490 #>>45677615 #>>45678221 #>>45678896 #
pasteldream ◴[23 Oct 25 02:23 UTC] No.45677490[source]▶
> The one thing I never understood about these warnings is how they don't run afoul of libel laws.

I’m not a lawyer, but this hasn’t ever been taken to court, has it? It might qualify as libel.

replies(2): >>45677851 #>>45678158 #
1. modzu ◴[23 Oct 25 04:23 UTC] No.45678158[source]▶
you only sue somebody poorer than you
replies(1): >>45679182 #
2. tgsovlerkhgsel ◴[23 Oct 25 07:29 UTC] No.45679182[source]▶
It depends, if it's a clear-cut case, then in jurisdictions with a functioning legal system it can be feasible to sue.

Likewise, if it's a fuckup that just needs to be put in front of someone who cares, a lawsuit is actually a surprisingly effective way of doing that. This moves your problem from "annoying customer support interaction that's best dealt with by stonewalling" into "legal says we HAVE to fix this".