←back to thread

I see a future in jj

(steveklabnik.com)
295 points steveklabnik | 1 comments | 22 Oct 25 17:21 UTC | HN request time: 0.25s | source
Show context
weinzierl ◴[22 Oct 25 20:14 UTC] No.45674580[source]▶
I think the real news is that some people have started to build what might become something like a "jjhub".

https://ersc.io/

replies(7): >>45674802 #>>45675236 #>>45675335 #>>45675688 #>>45677818 #>>45678591 #>>45678833 #
steveklabnik ◴[22 Oct 25 20:34 UTC] No.45674802[source]▶
I think 'jjhub' is a decent immediate first approximation, and is often how I've started out talking about it with people. At the same time, we have to offer real value here, as you can already use jj with github (and I have for a long time now), so there's more to it than that. But yes :)
replies(3): >>45675242 #>>45676675 #>>45678269 #
davidkunz ◴[22 Oct 25 21:16 UTC] No.45675242[source]▶
What I would love:

- Everything locally stored in the repo: PRs, comments, issues, discussions, boards, ... - CLI first - Offline first (+ syncing) - A website for hosting/presentation

replies(2): >>45675308 #>>45675504 #
ElectricalUnion ◴[22 Oct 25 21:40 UTC] No.45675504[source]▶
So you want Fossil?
replies(2): >>45676492 #>>45677093 #
1. anotherevan ◴[23 Oct 25 01:10 UTC] No.45677093[source]▶
When I tried Fossil it had things weirdly separated.

I was expecting when I make a commit, I would have the facility to specify what issues it addressed and it would close them for me automatically. It seemed there is so much opportunity there to "close the loop" when the issue tracker, etc and integrated in your VCS, but it wasn't taken.