←back to thread

I see a future in jj

(steveklabnik.com)
295 points steveklabnik | 3 comments | 22 Oct 25 17:21 UTC | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
jmercouris ◴[22 Oct 25 20:01 UTC] No.45674396[source]▶
After reading the article, the technical merits of `jj` are completely unclear.
replies(3): >>45674421 #>>45676645 #>>45678950 #
keyle[dead post] ◴[22 Oct 25 23:57 UTC] No.45676645[source]▶
[flagged]
1. steveklabnik ◴[23 Oct 25 00:19 UTC] No.45676794[source]▶
That line wasn’t even in the original post. It is not nearly the only technical advantage. The point of the post is just not about that topic, so that content is not in the post.
replies(1): >>45677087 #
2. keyle ◴[23 Oct 25 01:10 UTC] No.45677087[source]▶
That line _is_ in the post. Search for it. I'm not sure what you're on about.
replies(1): >>45677126 #
3. steveklabnik ◴[23 Oct 25 01:17 UTC] No.45677126[source]▶
Wasn’t in the original post. I added it based on feedback in this thread.