←back to thread

72 points nsomani | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.415s | source
Show context
skrrtww ◴[] No.45675292[source]
This might be the worst named project of all time. Not funny and demonstrates an absolutely terrible impulse on the part of the author. Probably the worst way possible to advertise your project.

edit: According to the author in a reply, the double entendre was in fact not intentional.

replies(7): >>45675351 #>>45675482 #>>45675644 #>>45675679 #>>45675741 #>>45676302 #>>45676382 #
antonvs ◴[] No.45676382[source]
You know you're spending too much time on dubious sites when ...
replies(1): >>45676616 #
1. nvader ◴[] No.45676616[source]
Not really, unfortunately the word hovers in the comment sections of mainstream American political discourse.
replies(1): >>45677366 #
2. antonvs ◴[] No.45677366[source]
I suppose it depends on one's definition of "dubious sites".