←back to thread

Do not accept terms and conditions

(www.termsandconditions.game)
97 points halflife | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.207s | source
Show context
topkai22 ◴[] No.45660482[source]
For mandatory T&Cs I'll put in the signature box "Decline", including updating the HTML page to say "decline" instead of "OK" and screenshotting it or modifying the HTTP response sent back to include riders.

I know it probably won't matter, but it's kind of fun for me.

replies(2): >>45660774 #>>45663504 #
odie5533 ◴[] No.45660774[source]
No chance that would hold up in court. Clickwraps have been tested in courts and are fully enforceable.
replies(5): >>45660851 #>>45661248 #>>45661275 #>>45665095 #>>45676694 #
wat10000 ◴[] No.45660851[source]
And keep in mind that (at least in the US) the opposite of "I accept the terms and conditions" is not "I get to do whatever I want," it's "I am accessing this service without authorization, which is a crime under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act."
replies(2): >>45661181 #>>45661294 #
NoMoreNicksLeft ◴[] No.45661181[source]
If I'm on the jury, I'll make sure he walks.

The only valid agreements require the party seeking the agreement to make efforts in that pursuit. Did a human view the signed agreement afterward? Do they store that signed agreement in such a way as to be able to retrieve it if they need to contest the terms later?

Then no agreement was made.

And as for the CFAA provisions, if they put those resources on the public internet, then the public has the right to interact with them. You can't fence off the sidewalk and claim that someone trespasses when they walk on it.

replies(4): >>45661403 #>>45661482 #>>45662610 #>>45664088 #
heavyset_go ◴[] No.45661482[source]
> If I'm on the jury, I'll make sure he walks.

If you're going to be on a jury, don't post things like this on the internet, even if I agree with you.

replies(1): >>45671466 #
NoMoreNicksLeft ◴[] No.45671466[source]
I haven't been summoned yet. If they're digging through my 10 yr old HN posts during voire dire though, I think we're in some sort of trouble that a verdict can't fix.
replies(1): >>45676148 #
1. heavyset_go ◴[] No.45676148[source]
I think we're already there, at least regarding the trouble part :(

Semi-seriously, though, billions are being poured into the correlation of social media posts with real identities, it could be offered as an automated process for a fee that any lawyer would be happy to pay.