(www.djangoproject.com)

106 points webology | 1 comments | 22 Oct 25 19:46 UTC | HN request time: 0.202s | source

Show context

tkcranny ◴[22 Oct 25 20:23 UTC] No.45674677[source]▶

Looks like Django 6 is getting an offical task system.

There’s no real world brokers or workers supported (at least built in), but still centralising around a standard interface might make things nicer than the celery tentacle monsters Django apps eventually tend to mutate into.

replies(3): >>45674764 #>>45675195 #>>45675539 #

ponytech ◴[22 Oct 25 21:12 UTC] No.45675195[source]▶

>>45674677 #

I don´t understand how you could use this new tasks system in production if there is no real workers when it's released? Are there any 3rd party yet?

replies(2): >>45675254 #>>45675332 #

1. HiPhish ◴[22 Oct 25 21:17 UTC] No.45675254[source]▶

>>45675195 #

I guess the idea is first to provide a generic interface to connect various backends to and let the community develop those. Users of Django should then be able to swap one out for another. Maybe one will emerge as a quasi-standard or maybe it will be like database backends where different backends serve different purposes.

At leas that's my guess.

↑

Django 6.0 beta 1 released