←back to thread

Meta is axing 600 roles across its AI division

(www.theverge.com)
492 points Lionga | 1 comments | 22 Oct 25 16:44 UTC | HN request time: 0.207s | source
Show context
Rebuff5007 ◴[22 Oct 25 18:46 UTC] No.45673440[source]▶
From a quick online search:

- OpenAI's mission is to build safe AI, and ensure AI's benefits are as widely and evenly distributed as possible.

- Google's mission is to organise the world's information and make it universally accessible and useful.

- Meta's mission is to build the future of human connection and the technology that makes it possible.

Lets just take these three companies, and their self-defined mission statements. I see what google and openai are after. Is there any case for anyone to make inside or outside Meta that AI is needed to build the future of human connection? What problem is Meta trying to solve with their billions of investment in "super" intelligence? I genuinely have no idea, and they probably don't either. Which is why they would be laying of 600 people a week after paying a billion dollars to some guy for working on the same stuff.

EDIT: everyone commenting that mission statements are PR fluff. Fine. What is a productive way they can use LLMs in any of their flagship products today?

replies(19): >>45673534 #>>45673569 #>>45673578 #>>45673581 #>>45673583 #>>45673603 #>>45673716 #>>45673858 #>>45673905 #>>45673939 #>>45673979 #>>45674097 #>>45674105 #>>45674121 #>>45674124 #>>45674319 #>>45674664 #>>45674757 #>>45675885 #
1. frenchmajesty ◴[22 Oct 25 19:37 UTC] No.45674105[source]▶
You are looking at it wrong. Meta is a business. You know what they sell? Ads.

In fact, they are the #1 or #2 place in the world to sell an ad depending on who you ask. If the future turns out to be LLM-driven, all that ad-money is going to go to OpenAI or worse to Google; leaving Zuck with no revenue.

So why are they after AI? Because they are in the business of selling eyeballs placement and LLM becoming the defacto platform would eat into their margins.