←back to thread

Meta is axing 600 roles across its AI division

(www.theverge.com)
492 points Lionga | 1 comments | 22 Oct 25 16:44 UTC | HN request time: 0.244s | source
Show context
Rebuff5007 ◴[22 Oct 25 18:46 UTC] No.45673440[source]▶
From a quick online search:

- OpenAI's mission is to build safe AI, and ensure AI's benefits are as widely and evenly distributed as possible.

- Google's mission is to organise the world's information and make it universally accessible and useful.

- Meta's mission is to build the future of human connection and the technology that makes it possible.

Lets just take these three companies, and their self-defined mission statements. I see what google and openai are after. Is there any case for anyone to make inside or outside Meta that AI is needed to build the future of human connection? What problem is Meta trying to solve with their billions of investment in "super" intelligence? I genuinely have no idea, and they probably don't either. Which is why they would be laying of 600 people a week after paying a billion dollars to some guy for working on the same stuff.

EDIT: everyone commenting that mission statements are PR fluff. Fine. What is a productive way they can use LLMs in any of their flagship products today?

replies(19): >>45673534 #>>45673569 #>>45673578 #>>45673581 #>>45673583 #>>45673603 #>>45673716 #>>45673858 #>>45673905 #>>45673939 #>>45673979 #>>45674097 #>>45674105 #>>45674121 #>>45674124 #>>45674319 #>>45674664 #>>45674757 #>>45675885 #
1. dh2022 ◴[22 Oct 25 19:24 UTC] No.45673939[source]▶
Re: "What is a productive way they can use LLMs in any of their flagship products today" - with LLMs users would not interact with other users and also users would not leave the platform.

Meta's actual mission is to keep people on the platform and to do what can be done so users do not leave the platform. I found out that from this perspective Meta's actions make more sense.