←back to thread

582 points SweetSoftPillow | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.209s | source
Show context
michaelmauderer ◴[] No.45668112[source]
The problem here is not the law, but malicious compliance by websites that don't want to give up tracking.

"Spend Five Minutes in a Menu of Legalese" is not the intended alternative to "Accept All". "Decline All" is! And this is starting to be enforced through the courts, so you're increasingly seeing the "Decline All" option right away. As it should be. https://www.techspot.com/news/108043-german-court-takes-stan...

Of course, also respecting a Do-Not-Track header and avoiding the cookie banner entirely while not tracking the user, would be even better.

replies(27): >>45668188 #>>45668227 #>>45668253 #>>45668318 #>>45668333 #>>45668375 #>>45668478 #>>45668528 #>>45668587 #>>45668695 #>>45668802 #>>45668844 #>>45669149 #>>45669369 #>>45669513 #>>45669674 #>>45670524 #>>45670593 #>>45670822 #>>45670839 #>>45671739 #>>45671750 #>>45673134 #>>45673283 #>>45674480 #>>45675431 #>>45678865 #
1. self_awareness ◴[] No.45673134[source]
"The problem is not the law but with the people who don't follow it."

I mean... uh.

If the world would only consist of people who want to cooperate and don't have malicious intentions, then WE WOULDN'T NEED THE LAW AT ALL.

The law exists BECASUE OF the people who don't want to comply. So if the law doesn't control those people who don't want to comply, then the problem is with the law.

Because if we're saying that the problem is with the people, then the discussion is pointless like a black hole.