←back to thread

429 points AbhishekParmar | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.402s | source
Show context
aantix[dead post] ◴[] No.45671716[source]
[flagged]
udev4096 ◴[] No.45672417[source]
Classic HN, always downvoting every comment concerning decentralized and p2p currencies. How do you like your centralized, no privacy, mass surveilled worthless banking system
replies(1): >>45672734 #
logtrees ◴[] No.45672734[source]
I don't consider the current system to be worthless. In fact, it functions remarkably well. There is certainly room for additional substrate layers though, and Bitcoin being digital or electronic gold and Ethereum being an e-steam engine or e-computer make for a powerful combination for applications together. I agree that the crowd here has historically not understood, or wanted to understand, the underlying protocols and what is possible. A bizarre kind of hubris perhaps, or maybe just a response to how the first iterations of a web2.5 or web3.0 were...admittedly more mired in a kind of marketing hype that was not as reflective of what is possible and sustainable in the space due to there not being realistic web and engineering muscle at the forefront of the hype.

I think this current cycle is going to change that though. The kinds of projects spinning up are truly massive, innovative, and interesting. Stay tuned!

replies(1): >>45672912 #
1. udev4096 ◴[] No.45672912[source]
It's not about how well it functions, bot. Go spread your propaganda somewhere else
replies(1): >>45672985 #
2. logtrees ◴[] No.45672985[source]
What is it about then? I'm not spreading propaganda - I'm maximally truth seeking and approaching things from a technical/economic/governance point of view and not an ideological one per se. Though ideology shapes everything, what I mean is that I'm not ideologically predisposed towards a conclusion on things. For me what matters is the core, truthy aspects of a given subject.