←back to thread

492 points Lionga | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.2s | source
Show context
ceejayoz ◴[] No.45672187[source]
Because the AI works so well, or because it doesn't?

> ”By reducing the size of our team, fewer conversations will be required to make a decision, and each person will be more load-bearing and have more scope and impact,” Wang writes in a memo seen by Axios.

That's kinda wild. I'm kinda shocked they put it in writing.

replies(34): >>45672233 #>>45672238 #>>45672266 #>>45672367 #>>45672370 #>>45672398 #>>45672463 #>>45672519 #>>45672571 #>>45672592 #>>45672666 #>>45672709 #>>45672722 #>>45672855 #>>45672862 #>>45672949 #>>45673049 #>>45673060 #>>45673501 #>>45673549 #>>45673723 #>>45673795 #>>45674537 #>>45674817 #>>45674914 #>>45675187 #>>45675194 #>>45675426 #>>45675612 #>>45676161 #>>45676264 #>>45676418 #>>45676920 #>>45678165 #
hn_throwaway_99 ◴[] No.45672398[source]
Why do you think it's wild? I've seen that dynamic before (i.e. too many cooks in the kitchen) and this seems like an honest assessment.
replies(1): >>45672543 #
stefan_ ◴[] No.45672543[source]
It's a meaningless nonsense tautology? Is that the level of leadership there?

Maybe they should reduce it all to Wang, he can make all decisions with the impact and scope he is truly capable of.

replies(2): >>45672839 #>>45677750 #
1. mangamadaiyan ◴[] No.45672839[source]
... and bear more load as well.