←back to thread

AI assistants misrepresent news content 45% of the time

(www.bbc.co.uk)
423 points sohkamyung | 1 comments | 22 Oct 25 13:39 UTC | HN request time: 0.351s | source
Show context
alcide ◴[22 Oct 25 14:21 UTC] No.45669582[source]▶
Kagi News has been pretty accurate. Source information is provided along with the summary and key details too.

AI summarizes are good for getting a feel of if you want to read an article or not. Even with Kagi News I verify key facts myself.

replies(6): >>45669784 #>>45670009 #>>45670554 #>>45670632 #>>45672369 #>>45672702 #
1. dan_h ◴[22 Oct 25 17:28 UTC] No.45672369[source]▶
I've has a similar experience with my own project that summarizes rss articles--the results have largely been pretty good, but I found using a "reasoning" model had much better results.