(blog.google)

429 points AbhishekParmar | 3 comments | 22 Oct 25 15:16 UTC | HN request time: 1.471s | source

1. corranh ◴[22 Oct 25 15:36 UTC] No.45670730[source]▶

Main caveat is that it’s verifiable (by them) but repeatable by others (in principle).

replies(1): >>45672774 #

2. portaouflop ◴[22 Oct 25 17:56 UTC] No.45672774[source]▶

So actually it’s neither verifiable or repeatable in any real-works definition of the words.

replies(1): >>45673677 #

3. jeffhuys ◴[22 Oct 25 19:05 UTC] No.45673677[source]▶

This is your second comment in this thread (as far as I’ve scrolled) saying this without an explanation. Could you elaborate on why?

Willow quantum chip demonstrates verifiable quantum advantage on hardware