←back to thread

AI assistants misrepresent news content 45% of the time

(www.bbc.co.uk)
423 points sohkamyung | 1 comments | 22 Oct 25 13:39 UTC | HN request time: 0.279s | source
Show context
alcide ◴[22 Oct 25 14:21 UTC] No.45669582[source]▶
Kagi News has been pretty accurate. Source information is provided along with the summary and key details too.

AI summarizes are good for getting a feel of if you want to read an article or not. Even with Kagi News I verify key facts myself.

replies(6): >>45669784 #>>45670009 #>>45670554 #>>45670632 #>>45672369 #>>45672702 #
1. jjtheblunt ◴[22 Oct 25 15:23 UTC] No.45670554[source]▶
agreed on Kagi News, and Particle News has been good, but they accepted funding from The Atlantic which evidently earns "Featured Article" positioning to articles from funding sources, muddying the clarity of biases, which Particle News has a nice graphic indicator for, though i've not seen it under promoted Feature Articles. Surely applies to other funding sources, but The Atlantic one was pretty recent.