←back to thread

672 points LexSiga | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.265s | source
Show context
MuteXR ◴[] No.45666513[source]
Keep in mind this is the same project that removed all useful functionality from the included web UI in the community edition with the excuse that it was too much effort to maintain.

This is another case of VC-funded companies pulling up the ladder behind themselves.

replies(3): >>45666636 #>>45669083 #>>45675139 #
jinkylist ◴[] No.45666636[source]
Is it an excuse? Maintaining code costs money, and the previous versions are provided under the license, and you're free to modify it, pull selective patches and maintain them yourself. While It'd be convenient if the license was a promise to develop and maintain features for free in perpetuity, it just isn't.

I run into this in non-company backed open source projects all the time too. Some maintainer gets burned out or non-interested and all they're rewarded is people with pitchforks because they thought there were some sort of obligations to provide free updates and suppport

replies(5): >>45667421 #>>45667523 #>>45667743 #>>45669968 #>>45673600 #
1. mpalmer ◴[] No.45669968[source]
Conversely, if instead of making your users happy to pay you, you've made them happy to use your stuff for free, you own the consequences when you stop giving that stuff away.

Welcome to HN BTW, I see you were inspired to sign up and defend the project owner.