←back to thread

AI assistants misrepresent news content 45% of the time

(www.bbc.co.uk)
423 points sohkamyung | 1 comments | 22 Oct 25 13:39 UTC | HN request time: 0.271s | source
Show context
alcide ◴[22 Oct 25 14:21 UTC] No.45669582[source]▶
Kagi News has been pretty accurate. Source information is provided along with the summary and key details too.

AI summarizes are good for getting a feel of if you want to read an article or not. Even with Kagi News I verify key facts myself.

replies(6): >>45669784 #>>45670009 #>>45670554 #>>45670632 #>>45672369 #>>45672702 #
delusional ◴[22 Oct 25 14:37 UTC] No.45669784[source]▶
What if the AI makes an interesting or important article sound like one you don't want to read? You'd never cross check the fact, and you'd never discover how wrong the AI was.
replies(4): >>45669966 #>>45670174 #>>45670299 #>>45670572 #
1. ◴[22 Oct 25 14:48 UTC] No.45669966[source]▶