(www.bbc.co.uk)

421 points sohkamyung | 3 comments | 22 Oct 25 13:39 UTC | HN request time: 0.724s | source

Show context

Hikikomori[dead post] ◴[22 Oct 25 14:09 UTC] No.45669426[source]▶

[flagged]

1. walkabout ◴[22 Oct 25 14:16 UTC] No.45669511[source]▶

Relatedly, I wonder if we count misrepresenting a misleading news article such that it becomes more-accurate as misrepresenting news content…

replies(1): >>45671759 #

2. zahlman ◴[22 Oct 25 16:43 UTC] No.45671759[source]▶

>>45669511 (TP) #

Since the model doesn't get to observe the actual situation being reported on, such an improvement in accuracy would only be random chance and should not be rewarded.

replies(1): >>45673037 #

3. walkabout ◴[22 Oct 25 18:14 UTC] No.45673037[source]▶

>>45671759 #

Oh, agreed, they don’t get points for failing the task but accidentally reporting something more-correct in the process.

↑

AI assistants misrepresent news content 45% of the time