←back to thread

257 points voxadam | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
skopje ◴[] No.45663732[source]
PoE is awesome. My custom home security system is all CCTV PoE with a gstreamer backend running on four-core fanless linux box. Way to go. Complete control. No batteries, no wares spying on me, no personal data getting scraped by big guys. (Cloud connectivity sucks because I have segmented mp4s and jogging through them hurts but I only care for events after they happen, not while they happen.)
replies(6): >>45663770 #>>45664711 #>>45664915 #>>45665099 #>>45665193 #>>45667449 #
benhurmarcel ◴[] No.45667449[source]
If one of those cameras is outside, did you consider the case of someone plugging in his laptop on that ethernet cable? He'd be on your local network.
replies(6): >>45667551 #>>45667567 #>>45667989 #>>45669412 #>>45671399 #>>45672136 #
1. tehlike ◴[] No.45669412[source]
Vlan is the answer.
replies(1): >>45669481 #
2. beala ◴[] No.45669481[source]
This is a pretty significant lift for most home networks, both in terms of cost and complexity, but I agree it’s the right way to go. If you’re upgrading to a PoE switch, you might as well go all the way and make it a managed switch.
replies(2): >>45670986 #>>45671789 #
3. thmsths ◴[] No.45670986[source]
I would assume that putting a router between the POE switch and the rest of the network would work too and basic routers are cheap.
4. mmmlinux ◴[] No.45671789[source]
When you get to the point of building out your own ip security camera system and then worrying that some hacker is going to roll up and plug in to one of your cameras. you probably already have vlans going.
replies(1): >>45682143 #
5. tehlike ◴[] No.45682143{3}[source]
The more likely scenario is camera firmware being compromised and either allowing outbound or inbound connections, either of which can be prevented with a firewall+vlan