←back to thread

583 points SweetSoftPillow | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
rustc ◴[] No.45668037[source]
Or just ban this kind of data collection. Is there any reason anyone would willingly click "Accept" when a website asks to share your data with 500+ partner sites?
replies(10): >>45668108 #>>45668122 #>>45668260 #>>45668263 #>>45668342 #>>45668470 #>>45668532 #>>45668715 #>>45673000 #>>45675491 #
regentbowerbird ◴[] No.45668342[source]
The same could be said with all advertising and surveillance.

No one wants to be advertised to, but powerful lobbies argue that ending ads will lower consumption and thus harm the economy; and no politician wants to lower GDP.

No one wants to be spied on, but powerful lobbies argue tracking people allow better security; and no politician wants to be soft on crime and terrorism.

replies(3): >>45668481 #>>45669258 #>>45669561 #
phkahler ◴[] No.45668481[source]
>> No one wants to be advertised to, but powerful lobbies argue that ending ads will lower consumption and thus harm the economy; and no politician wants to lower GDP.

I doubt that. People tend to spend their money regardless. Advertising just determines what they spend it on.

replies(4): >>45668697 #>>45669051 #>>45669150 #>>45669459 #
1. tcfhgj ◴[] No.45669051[source]
not so sure about that, I am pretty sure ads promote materialism and consumerism, probably even leading to people working more to be able to afford more