←back to thread

375 points begueradj | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.724s | source
Show context
greatgib ◴[] No.45666908[source]
Something really scary in France right now is that you can see really clearly how most mainstream media are used for propaganda.

Since a few days, there is an abundance of cover and articles in most major newspaper here with propaganda and repeated lies supporting him. It's hard to imagine but non stop. You have everyday interviews of his family saying that it is an injustice, that he did nothing, that the judgement was rigged, that he was a great men that served France and so should not be treated like everyone else. Article about how sad the poor family is. Number of articles repeating friends of him verbatim s that the judgement was fake.

Almost none speaking about the facts, the grounds for his sentence, the big number of other trials against him that are running. And also the other definitive convictions he got. Like for attempting to bribe a head prosecutor to get insider info about his case. Using a prepaid line opened with a fake name...

But what you see in the end is that 90% of medias in France belongs to a few wealthy families that are friends with him.

replies(33): >>45667324 #>>45668421 #>>45668612 #>>45668831 #>>45668890 #>>45668939 #>>45669114 #>>45669314 #>>45669367 #>>45669422 #>>45669424 #>>45669433 #>>45669600 #>>45669810 #>>45669945 #>>45670214 #>>45670217 #>>45670345 #>>45670498 #>>45670858 #>>45671088 #>>45671090 #>>45671499 #>>45671516 #>>45671973 #>>45672208 #>>45672579 #>>45672726 #>>45673007 #>>45673552 #>>45673588 #>>45674617 #>>45677167 #
Aurornis ◴[] No.45668831[source]
> Since a few days, there is an abundance of cover and articles in most major newspaper here with propaganda and repeated lies supporting him.

How much of this is driven by contrarian and counter-cyclical reporting?

I’m not familiar with French media, but I see the same pattern in every country where I’ve kept up with the news: Media starts being favorable to a topic when it’s up and coming, switching to being highly critical when that topic becomes mainstream, then reverts again to exploring the positives when the topic falls out of favor.

You see it even with people like Elizabeth Holmes. News stories about her fraud were everywhere until she had to go to jail, but now the news has swung to humanizing her, claiming her sentencing was excessive, focusing on the angle of a mother separated from her children, and confusingly ignoring her fraud at all.

It’s all designed to be counter-narrative and rise waves of controversy. The more controversial, the more shares and views.

replies(10): >>45669031 #>>45669406 #>>45669614 #>>45670001 #>>45670070 #>>45670085 #>>45670470 #>>45670995 #>>45673036 #>>45673261 #
1. dijit ◴[] No.45669031[source]
I have a much less charitable view than you about Elizabeth Holmes.

The fact that a new publicist was hired by her before all the sympathetic press started coming out is enough for me to believe that there's a link there and not a natural news swing cycle.

https://www.theverge.com/news/611549/elizabeth-holmes-people...

replies(1): >>45669919 #
2. orionsbelt ◴[] No.45669919[source]
I don’t have a strong enough view here to have an opinion, but I think someone as rich as her always had a publicist, so to play devils advocate, it may be true that the press only played ball with the publicist after she was convicted.
replies(2): >>45671271 #>>45671661 #
3. mattnewton ◴[] No.45671271[source]
Elizabeth Holmes had some very big fish as investors she ended up defrauding, so it’s possible the devil’s best advocates were busy advocating she go to jail before her sentence.
4. stickfigure ◴[] No.45671661[source]
Or maybe just the new publicist is better than the old publicist?

Or maybe it's a simple change of strategy; the goal is now "rehabilitate image" rather than "prevent conviction" - and with the new strategy, a new team.