←back to thread

582 points SweetSoftPillow | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.208s | source
Show context
mystraline ◴[] No.45668090[source]
The point of the 'annoy with consent banners' was to get people to 'allow (to be tracked) '.

Denying would, in many cases, go up to hundreds of yes/no options, with no 'deny all'. Makes getting coerced permission easy, and active denial almost impossible.

Of course, by not tracking, they dont need any of this crap. But surveillance capitalism must continue. Sigh.

replies(1): >>45668211 #
nemomarx ◴[] No.45668211[source]
Isn't not having a deny all button against the gdpr already?
replies(1): >>45668824 #
1. jeroenhd ◴[] No.45668824[source]
It depends. Denying consent should be as easy as giving consent, and consent needs to be informed. Without an "accept all" button/default, you don't need a "deny all" button.

The GDPR doesn't really care about implementations like that.