←back to thread

Internet's biggest annoyance: Cookie laws should target browsers, not websites

(nednex.com)
583 points SweetSoftPillow | 1 comments | 22 Oct 25 12:12 UTC | HN request time: 0.257s | source
Show context
NegativeK ◴[22 Oct 25 12:29 UTC] No.45668043[source]▶
So why didn't GDPR require Do Not Track to be honored? It was already there, to be expanded on if needed.

But I can't imagine copmanies would want that. They benefit from cookie dialogs fatigue, and for some reason people blame GDPR of all things for surveillance tech being annoying in how they ask for permission.

replies(2): >>45668101 #>>45668156 #
p_l ◴[22 Oct 25 12:39 UTC] No.45668156[source]▶
GDPR does not mandate specific technical solutions.

But actually honoring DNT properly would immediately mean no consent banner, but the consent banner is there to fool you into giving up your rights while providing (flimsy) legal cover for the company.

replies(2): >>45668724 #>>45668759 #
1. johannes1234321 ◴[22 Oct 25 13:21 UTC] No.45668724[source]▶
The banner is also there to make you complain about EU bureaucrats, for having the law changed. And it works: Outrage is often on EU cookie banners, not in people selling our data.