←back to thread

583 points SweetSoftPillow | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.351s | source
Show context
vmaurin ◴[] No.45668002[source]
Same goes for age verification.

There was the DNT header, that was a bit to simplistic, but was never implemented https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Reference/...

The thing people need to understand here is that the annoyance is not due to lack of technical solutions, or regulations forcing something. It is explicitly wanted by the industry so they can maximize the consent rate. The browser solution is probably the best technical/user friendly one, but ad tech/data gathering industry won't have any consent. As they control most of the web, they will never do that

replies(4): >>45668031 #>>45668051 #>>45668121 #>>45668873 #
p_l ◴[] No.45668121[source]
Fun fact - if you handle DNT properly, you don't need to show the consent screen... because you're not doing anything requiring said consent.
replies(2): >>45668507 #>>45668948 #
1. jeroenhd ◴[] No.45668507[source]
I believe Medium's DNT implementation showed a little confirmation button on embedded Youtube players. That's the kind of consent screen you may still need with proper DNT handling.

None of those cookie popups, though. That's all malicious compliance.