←back to thread

583 points SweetSoftPillow | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.211s | source
Show context
mihaic ◴[] No.45668163[source]
Policing the tools instead of policing what is being done with them is the problem for me. Third party cookies have a valid reason to be used in federated authentication for instance, or a bunch of other valid purposes. Just ban shitty data collection practices.

Knives can be used to chop vegetables or stab someone. Don't ban their sale, ban their usage.

replies(2): >>45668207 #>>45668852 #
high_na_euv ◴[] No.45668207[source]
Cookie consent is not required for technical cookies like auth.
replies(3): >>45668331 #>>45668361 #>>45668672 #
1. lucumo ◴[] No.45668361[source]
Indeed. Nor is GDPR about cookies at all. GDPR is about identifiable user profiles and information. A piece of paper with someone's name falls under the GDPR; a cookie that hides a shown alert doesn't.