←back to thread

582 points SweetSoftPillow | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
michaelmauderer ◴[] No.45668112[source]
The problem here is not the law, but malicious compliance by websites that don't want to give up tracking.

"Spend Five Minutes in a Menu of Legalese" is not the intended alternative to "Accept All". "Decline All" is! And this is starting to be enforced through the courts, so you're increasingly seeing the "Decline All" option right away. As it should be. https://www.techspot.com/news/108043-german-court-takes-stan...

Of course, also respecting a Do-Not-Track header and avoiding the cookie banner entirely while not tracking the user, would be even better.

replies(27): >>45668188 #>>45668227 #>>45668253 #>>45668318 #>>45668333 #>>45668375 #>>45668478 #>>45668528 #>>45668587 #>>45668695 #>>45668802 #>>45668844 #>>45669149 #>>45669369 #>>45669513 #>>45669674 #>>45670524 #>>45670593 #>>45670822 #>>45670839 #>>45671739 #>>45671750 #>>45673134 #>>45673283 #>>45674480 #>>45675431 #>>45678865 #
torginus ◴[] No.45668188[source]
I wonder why people don't build a collection of scripts into a browser plugin, like Adblock that auto rejects all tracking info to the greatest extent possible?
replies(5): >>45668206 #>>45668212 #>>45668215 #>>45668244 #>>45669016 #
1. bvvgpc ◴[] No.45668212[source]
I would install that in a heartbeat!
replies(1): >>45668315 #
2. jraph ◴[] No.45668315[source]
Then enable the cookie banner lists in uBlock Origin. Do expect occasional breakages and remember to temporarily disable the blocking to get through.