←back to thread

270 points imasl42 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
greymalik ◴[] No.45659146[source]
> One could only wonder why they became a programmer in the first place, given their seeming disinterest in coding.

To solve problems. Coding is the means to an end, not the end itself.

> careful configuration of our editor, tinkering with dot files, and dev environments

That may be fun for you, but it doesn’t add value. It’s accidental complexity that I am happy to delegate.

replies(15): >>45659281 #>>45659294 #>>45659312 #>>45659328 #>>45659361 #>>45659373 #>>45659468 #>>45659961 #>>45660230 #>>45660862 #>>45661685 #>>45663128 #>>45664372 #>>45667053 #>>45676552 #
dingnuts ◴[] No.45659373[source]
A chef who sharpens his knives should stop because it doesn't add value

A contractor who prefers a specific brand of tool is wrong because the tool is a means to an end

This is what you sound like. Just because you don't understand the value of a craftsman picking and maintaining their tools doesn't mean the value isn't real.

replies(1): >>45659845 #
senordevnyc ◴[] No.45659845[source]
Yes, but the point of being a chef is the food, not the knives. If there's a better way to prepare food than a knife, but you refuse to change, are you really a chef? Or are you a chef knife enthusiast?
replies(4): >>45659932 #>>45660275 #>>45660539 #>>45661106 #
codyb ◴[] No.45660275[source]
The point is, a lot of us aren't convinced reviewing 8 meals made by agents in parallel _is_ producing better food.

And it also seems exceedingly wasteful to boot.

replies(1): >>45660519 #
senordevnyc ◴[] No.45660519[source]
I don't think that's really the point of this post; it's all about how LLMs are destroying our craft (ie, "I really like using knives!"), not really about whether the food is better.

I think the real problem is that it's actually increasingly difficult to defend the artisanal "no-AI" approach. I say this as a prior staff-level engineer at a big tech company who has spent the last six months growing my SaaS to ~$100k in ARR, and it never could have happened without AI. I like the kind of coding the OP is talking about too, but ultimately I'm getting paid to solve a problem for my customers. Getting too attached to the knives is missing the point.

replies(2): >>45662341 #>>45687610 #
codyb ◴[] No.45662341{5}[source]
Call me crazy, but my guess is that that may not have been able to happen without the decade of experience it took you to get to the Staff level engineering position at a big tech company which has enabled you to gain the skills required to review the AI code you're producing properly.
replies(1): >>45662836 #
senordevnyc ◴[] No.45662836{6}[source]
Totally true. But that's also a different point than "But I love using my knives!"
replies(2): >>45665606 #>>45668056 #
1. codyb ◴[] No.45668056{7}[source]
Absolutely. But, what if the point of using the knives, is to be able to understand how to use the machines which can use knives for us, and if we're not replicating the learning part, where do we end up?