←back to thread

433 points zdw | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
crmd ◴[] No.45660666[source]
One of the first things I do after getting an inquiry from a recruiter or friend referral is lookup the MX record for the company’s email domain. It is an anonymous one-command check to see if they’re a Microsoft shop.

If they are, it’s enormous personal red flag. MSFT is very popular so I’m only speaking about my own experience, but I have learned over the course of 20 years that an MSFT IT stack is highly correlated with me hating the engineering culture of an organization.

I know I am excluding a lot of companies with great engineering culture where I would thrive and who just happen to use Outlook/Sharepoint/Teams, etc. but it has had such better predictive power of rotten tech culture than any line of questioning I have come up with during interviews that I still use it.

I don’t mean any disrespect to MSFT-centric engineers out there - it’s not you it’s me.

replies(11): >>45660852 #>>45660872 #>>45661217 #>>45661616 #>>45662254 #>>45662313 #>>45662719 #>>45663474 #>>45663495 #>>45665083 #>>45675213 #
fujigawa ◴[] No.45661217[source]
I'm gonna be honest, you sound like a problem employee.

The companies not using Microsoft, are using Google. Which in my experience is equally or measurably worse.

Just personal data points, but every avowed Microsoft hater I've ever worked with has been... difficult. Like a-drag-on-the-team-because-he-refuses-to-use-company-tools difficult.

Edit: How does an aged post on this site go from +4 to -1 in the span of a few minutes?

replies(19): >>45661276 #>>45661318 #>>45661625 #>>45661903 #>>45661968 #>>45662387 #>>45662494 #>>45663148 #>>45663393 #>>45663463 #>>45664329 #>>45664878 #>>45666991 #>>45667600 #>>45667845 #>>45669168 #>>45669404 #>>45671057 #>>45672125 #
NeutralCrane ◴[] No.45662494[source]
Google is leaps and bounds preferable in my experience than Microsoft. I agree with the above. A Microsoft shop isn’t a guarantee the company culture is bad, but it’s correlated enough to be a flag.
replies(1): >>45667396 #
pjmlp ◴[] No.45667396[source]
Until one needs to reach out to support.
replies(2): >>45667552 #>>45667672 #
1. joenot443 ◴[] No.45667672[source]
Google's support for their business clients is considered pretty top of class.

The "Google lacks support" chorus we hear frequently is more associated with their free tier.

replies(2): >>45667901 #>>45669304 #
2. pjmlp ◴[] No.45667901[source]
That wasn't my experience on the only project I took part on GCP.
3. ExoticPearTree ◴[] No.45669304[source]
Where I am we're kind of Dual Stack for various reasons with GCP and Azure.

Microsoft support has been very good. Google support was abysmal and very "you're dumb, we're smart because we're Google" style.

And we pay money for support to both organizations.