←back to thread

404 points voxleone | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
bhouston ◴[] No.45655419[source]
Is this realistic? Doesn't the development timelines for a new large rocket stretch into more than a decade? Unless someone else had one under development...

Could this just be a pressure tactic on SpaceX?

replies(5): >>45655501 #>>45655566 #>>45655845 #>>45660581 #>>45664798 #
zugi ◴[] No.45664798[source]
> Could this just be a pressure tactic on SpaceX?

Yes! I'm disappointed I had to scroll down so far to see this. The CNN headline isn't even accurate. The actual NASA statement is:

> "I’m going to open up the contract. I’m going to let other space companies compete with SpaceX."

SpaceX is behind schedule, but still years ahead of its competitors. No one is even in the same ballpark on the main metric that ultimately matters: dollars per kilogram to orbit. The main effect of this NASA statement, or of NASA sending a few dollars to SpaceX's competitors, is to give SpaceX a kick in the pants.

replies(1): >>45666995 #
1. cubefox ◴[] No.45666995[source]
I think SpaceX can't accelerate much. They are already operating on a higher speed than (arguably) any other space company.